home blog about

AI Integrated Asymmetrical Maneuvers in Software Engineering and the Drought to End All Technical Moats;

or How I Learned to Stop Being Poor and Love The AI

The Midnight Ride of the Algorithmic Apocalypse

Listen, my children, and you shall hear of the midnight ride of the silicon sphere. One if by land, two if by sea, three if by GPU—the AI developers are coming, and they're riding in with more firepower than a Colonial militia ever dreamed of.

I've made this mistake before. In 2011, I looked at Bitcoin trading for $12 and thought, "Neat cryptographic experiment, but who needs digital money?" In 2003, I had the technical skills to build a social network but figured, "Why would people want to share their personal lives online?" Each time, I was technically capable but strategically blind. I was looking at revolutionary infrastructure and seeing merely interesting toys.

Now I'm watching the same pattern unfold with AI-assisted software development, except this time the transformation is happening at warp speed. The term "vibe coding" was coined by Andrej Karpathy just a few weeks ago, and already we're seeing entire companies emerge around this concept. The difference is that this time, I'm not missing the boat.

The Great Technical Moat Drought

For decades, software development has been protected by technical moats—complex knowledge barriers that kept casual builders out and experts in. You needed to understand memory management, database optimization, network protocols, deployment pipelines, and a dozen other specialized domains to build anything substantial. These moats created sustainable competitive advantages for those who mastered them.

When natural language becomes the primary interface for code generation, the barriers to entry collapse overnight.

Consider the current landscape: Cursor, with just 60 employees, went from zero to $100 million in recurring revenue by January 2025, less than two years since its launch. That's not a normal growth trajectory—that's what happens when you're selling pickaxes during a gold rush.

The Vibe Coding Revolution

Vibe coding is reshaping software engineering from strict, manual coding to more flexible and AI-powered development. The tools enabling this transformation—Cursor, Windsurf, GitHub Copilot, and Claude Code—aren't just making coding faster; they're making it accessible to anyone who can describe what they want in plain English.

The major appeal of vibe coding lies in how easy and accessible it is, making it much quicker to produce code and whip up small projects like a prototype website, game, or web app. This isn't just about productivity gains for existing developers—it's about expanding the pool of people who can create software from thousands to millions.

I've watched this playbook before. When WordPress democratized web publishing, established web agencies initially scoffed at the "amateur" websites being built. But WordPress didn't just enable amateur sites—it created an entire ecosystem of businesses, plugins, and services that generated billions in value. The professionals who adapted thrived; those who dismissed it as "not real web development" got left behind.

The Asymmetrical Advantage

The real opportunity isn't in the AI tools themselves—it's in the asymmetrical advantages they create. While traditional software companies are still optimizing their existing development processes, AI-native companies are building entirely new categories of applications that were previously impossible or economically unviable.

Windsurf, founded in 2021, launched its code generation product in November 2024 and is already bringing in $50 million in annualized revenue. These aren't incremental improvements—they're asymmetrical maneuvers that bypass traditional competitive dynamics entirely.

The pattern is clear: companies that integrate AI deeply into their development process can move faster, experiment more freely, and build more complex systems with smaller teams. They're not just competing on execution anymore—they're competing on imagination constrained only by the limits of natural language description.

The Coming Flood: Infinite Slop and Infinite Opportunity

Here's what keeps me up at night (in a good way): we're about to see a Cambrian explosion of software applications. When the barriers to building software drop from years of specialized training to hours of natural language conversation, the number of people who can create functional applications multiplies exponentially.

But let's be honest about what this explosion will look like. For every genuinely innovative application, we're going to see thousands of pieces of what I call "software slop"—hastily built, barely functional apps that solve problems nobody actually has. The app stores are about to become landfills of AI-generated mediocrity, drowning the genuinely useful applications in an ocean of algorithmic noise.

This isn't necessarily bad news—it's just the reality of democratized creation. When everyone has access to the same powerful tools, most of what gets created will be garbage. But buried in that garbage will be gems that never would have existed if software development remained locked behind technical barriers.

The opportunity isn't in avoiding the slop—it's in navigating through it to find the actual innovations and, more importantly, creating systems that profit from the entire ecosystem. While most people will be building individual apps, the real money will be in the infrastructure that supports, filters, distributes, and monetizes the flood of AI-generated software.

Think about it: when millions of people can build apps overnight, who makes money? The platforms that host them, the services that help users find the good ones, the payment processors that handle transactions, the analytics tools that measure performance. The picks-and-shovels opportunity isn't just in AI coding tools—it's in the entire ecosystem that will emerge to handle the deluge of software that's coming.

The Slop Economy and the Innovation Signal

This creates both unprecedented opportunity and an unprecedented signal-to-noise problem. The opportunity is obvious—if you can identify unmet needs and describe solutions clearly, you can build software to address them. But the challenge is equally clear: in a world where anyone can build an app in an afternoon, how do you find the actually valuable ones among the infinite sea of software slop?

The answer is that the value doesn't just lie in building great software—it lies in building the filters, platforms, and distribution mechanisms that help genuinely useful software find its audience while the slop gets buried in algorithmic obscurity. The companies that understand this won't just be building apps; they'll be building the systems that determine which apps succeed.

Moreover, even the "slop" represents opportunity. Every poorly built app represents a market signal—someone thought there was demand for that solution. The smart move isn't to dismiss these attempts but to analyze them for insights about unmet needs, then build better versions with more sustainable business models.

I've seen this movie before. In the early 2000s, I watched small businesses with basic WordPress sites outrank established companies with expensive custom websites simply because they updated their content more frequently and understood their customers better. Technical sophistication lost to market understanding and execution speed.

The Bitcoin Lesson Applied

My Bitcoin mistake wasn't about missing a financial opportunity—it was about failing to recognize infrastructural transformation. I evaluated Bitcoin as a currency rather than as a new financial protocol layer. I was asking "Who would use this instead of dollars?" instead of "What becomes possible when you can program money?"

With AI-assisted development, I'm asking different questions. Instead of "Will this replace programmers?" I'm asking "What becomes possible when anyone can build software?" Instead of "Is the code quality good enough?" I'm asking "How fast can good-enough solutions capture markets?"

The answer to that last question is becoming clear: very fast. AI-assisted programming is way more fun and effective than many thought it would be, and the tools are improving monthly, not yearly.

The question isn't whether this will happen, but how quickly you can adapt to the new reality.

The companies that will thrive are those that recognize this shift and position themselves accordingly. They're building AI-native products, integrating AI deeply into their development processes, and focusing on problems that can be solved through rapid iteration and experimentation rather than deep technical expertise.

The companies that will struggle are those that continue to rely on technical complexity as their primary competitive advantage. Their moats are being drained by AI tools that make their specialized knowledge accessible to anyone with a good idea and the ability to describe it clearly.

How I Learned to Stop Being Poor and Love AI

I missed Bitcoin because I was thinking like a traditional financial analyst. I missed the social media wave because I was thinking like a traditional software developer. I'm not missing the AI development wave because I'm thinking like someone who's been wrong about transformative technology before and learned from it.

The lesson isn't just about AI—it's about recognizing moments when fundamental assumptions about how industries work are changing. When those moments arrive, the biggest risk isn't making the wrong bet—it's not making any bet at all.

The AI developers are coming. The question is: are you ready to join them, or are you going to be left explaining why this time is different while they build the future around you?

The revolution isn't coming—it's here. The only question is whether you're going to be part of the cavalry or part of the landscape they're charging across.